Why was it called a RAT?
Well, think of the wad of hair that accumulates in your own hairbrush. If you
have long hair, it bears a rather remarkable resemblance to a small rodent.
Since one’s own hair makes the most satisfactory bulking agent for a
pompadour, ladies would naturally save their rats to make up these larger
rolls. (They were tucked into the “hair receiver,” a decorated china bowl
with a lid in which there was a round hole to tuck milady’s rats of hair.)
|
|
|
Although one’s own
natural hair was preferred for styling, imported hair was also used — long
and thickly textured Asian or Malaysian hair was prized. It could be bleached
out and dyed to match the wearer’s color, but this was expensive, as dyes
were very hard to match. Of course, most young women did not need hairpieces.
They used them, of course, to improve upon their natural endowments (much as
the Wonderbra is used today). It is possible, however, to lose one’s hair for
a variety of reasons.
|
AN HISTORICAL MONOGRAPH
As a dermatologist, I am
familiar with hair loss, but I thought it might be interesting to review some
turn-of-the-last-century medical papers on the subject. Imagine my surprise
when I discovered a monograph on alopecia (hair loss) by the great Victorian
dermatologist, Sir James Saunders.
In his masterful review
of types of hair loss, Sir James called attention to the different hair
growth patterns in men and women. With the onset of puberty, the natural
smooth hairline over the forehead
|
|
typically begins to develop inroads at the temples. This
so-called TEMPORAL THINNING occurs in men and, to a lesser extent,
some women. What is not as commonly known, however, is that women do
experience natural hair thinning —some is due to age, but the major cause is
genetic. Although a woman with a strong family history of baldness won’t go
completely bald, she will often experience thinning over the entire vertex,
or top of the head. This is called ANDROGENETIC ALOPECIA and it can start as
young as the late twenties if there is a strong family history on either
side.
Sir James also discussed
ALOPECIA AREATA, or “baldness in areas.” We now believe that most
cases of alopecia areata are autoimmune in nature, but this etiology was not
a consideration in the 19th century. There was more concentration
then on the role of stress in initiating the problem. A fascinating aspect of
alopecia areata is that, in older people, the non-pigmented or gray hairs are
not affected as quickly as the pigmented hairs. This is the source of stories
about someone undergoing emotional shock and “turning gray overnight.” The
dark hairs are lost rather suddenly, and only the gray ones are retained. New
hair regrowth is often gray too (it acquires color later) although sometimes
the hair never darkens again.
|
A CASE REPORT
Saunders’ monograph
included a remarkably cogent discussion of the psychologic factors involved
in hair loss, especially among women. Sir James described several case
histories with a detail that was surely admired by Holmes. In fact, one case
stood out so distinctively that I’d like to share it with you. A patient
identified in his monograph by the initials “V.M.” had been afflicted with
recurrent hair loss since the age of 14 (she was then
|
20). Her bald patches had episodically regrown hair, but new
areas of fallout would occur after a few months, a cycle that Sir James
documented with photographs in his publication. The newest and most extensive
episode, however, involved loss of the hair on her frontal scalp, rendering
the top of her head almost bald. This classically masculine pattern of hair
loss had evidently tipped her mind into the realm of madness.
As V.M.’s alopecia
progressed, Sir James wrote that she began wearing a veiled cap and removed
all the mirrors from her house. She became morose and tearful, muttering
constantly about a “family curse.” She stayed indoors, even
stopping her visits to Sir James’ hair loss clinic. He was puzzled by V.M.’s
strange hysteria, as she had managed her previous episodes of hair loss in
an extremely calm and rational fashion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|